<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>PursuitAgent — field notes on proposal work</title><description>Deep dives on RFP workflows, grounded-AI architecture, and what we learn from every proposal that ships through PursuitAgent.</description><link>https://bidforge.com/</link><language>en-us</language><item><title>A year of writing about proposals, in 52 weekly notes</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/year-of-writing-52-notes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/year-of-writing-52-notes/</guid><description>Anniversary post. One year, 365 posts, and an honest accounting. Fifty-two weekly distillations, a scorecard on the five rules we set at launch, and what surprised us about writing a field journal in public.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>anniversary</category><category>meta</category><category>year-review</category><category>field-journal</category></item><item><title>Citations are the product, a year in</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/citations-are-the-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/citations-are-the-product/</guid><description>The line from our grounded-AI pledge at month one to how the product is now judged by reviewers. Citations were a feature. Now they&apos;re what customers are buying.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>grounded-ai</category><category>citations</category><category>grounded-ai</category><category>product-thesis</category></item><item><title>The win-theme retirement ceremony</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/win-theme-retirement-ceremony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/win-theme-retirement-ceremony/</guid><description>A quarterly ritual: which win themes we stop using, and why. This quarter, three retired. One we kept against better judgment.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>craft</category><category>win-themes</category><category>craft</category><category>retirement</category></item><item><title>The system-health check at year one</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/system-health-anniversary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/system-health-anniversary/</guid><description>Four dashboards we watch every morning. What each one caught this quarter — and the one that nearly missed a regression.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>observability</category><category>dashboards</category><category>system-health</category></item><item><title>The Monday bid-board review, a year on</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/monday-bid-board-review-quarterly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/monday-bid-board-review-quarterly/</guid><description>A year of running the same Monday ritual. Three changes we made to the review itself after 52 weeks — and one we wish we&apos;d made sooner.</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>ritual</category><category>bid-board</category><category>monday</category><category>cadence</category></item><item><title>Reviews watch: what G2 and Capterra said in April</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/reviews-weekly-sweep-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/reviews-weekly-sweep-april/</guid><description>The anniversary reading. A year of incumbent review sentiment, with a cut on what changed in April 2026.</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>research</category><category>reviews</category><category>g2</category><category>capterra</category><category>competitive</category></item><item><title>Shipped: auto-generated post-mortem themes</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/shipped-post-mortem-auto-themes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/shipped-post-mortem-auto-themes/</guid><description>After 200 debriefs the themes cluster predictably. The clustering is now automatic — here&apos;s what ships, what it does, and what it refuses to do.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>shipped</category><category>post-mortem</category><category>clustering</category></item><item><title>The customer segment we chose not to serve</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/customer-segment-we-chose-not-to-serve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/customer-segment-we-chose-not-to-serve/</guid><description>One segment we declined a year ago. Why the decision held, what we gave up, and the conditions under which we&apos;ll revisit it.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>strategy</category><category>segmentation</category><category>category</category></item><item><title>The evidence vault, a year in: attestations, tests, audits</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/evidence-vault-attestations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/evidence-vault-attestations/</guid><description>What lives in the evidence vault, what expires, and the alerting that catches expirations before a DDQ cites a stale attestation.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>procurement</category><category>evidence-vault</category><category>attestations</category><category>ddq</category><category>expiry-alerts</category></item><item><title>The internal SME review cadence we kept</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/internal-sme-review-cadence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/internal-sme-review-cadence/</guid><description>Weekly 20 minutes beats monthly 90. A year of iterating on our own SME review rhythm, and the cadence that finally stuck.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>team-workflow</category><category>sme</category><category>review-cadence</category><category>team-workflow</category></item><item><title>Block schema v3: merging KB blocks and evidence atoms</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/block-schema-v3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/block-schema-v3/</guid><description>The schema change that let DDQ evidence live in the same store as proposal answers. What we split, what we merged, and the migration that took a week longer than we planned.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>schema</category><category>postgres</category><category>kb</category><category>evidence-vault</category></item><item><title>The proposal team I wish we&apos;d hired first</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/the-proposal-team-i-wish-we-hired-first/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/the-proposal-team-i-wish-we-hired-first/</guid><description>A year in, an honest look at the hiring order on our own proposal function — who we brought on in what sequence, and the reordering that would have saved us six months.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>team-workflow</category><category>hiring</category><category>proposal-team</category><category>operator</category></item><item><title>The federal task-order RFP wave of 2026</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/federal-task-order-rfps-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/federal-task-order-rfps-2026/</guid><description>IDIQ task-order patterns from the first half of 2026. How response windows, page caps, and evaluation schemes have shifted — and how teams are staffing against them.</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>federal</category><category>idiq</category><category>task-orders</category><category>research</category></item><item><title>The Saturday KB hygiene drill</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/saturday-kb-hygiene-drill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/saturday-kb-hygiene-drill/</guid><description>Thirty-five minutes of knowledge-base maintenance that keeps Monday&apos;s drafts from citing stale content. A year in, here&apos;s the drill that actually stuck.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>team-workflow</category><category>knowledge-base</category><category>workflow</category><category>saturday</category></item><item><title>April DDQ patterns, a year later</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/q2-ddq-patterns-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/q2-ddq-patterns-april/</guid><description>A field note on the questionnaires that landed this week — what&apos;s repeating from last April, what&apos;s new, and the two categories that are quietly eating the most response time.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>procurement</category><category>ddq</category><category>procurement</category><category>field-note</category></item><item><title>Draft latency, a year on: 45s P95 to 28s</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/draft-latency-update/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/draft-latency-update/</guid><description>A year of draft-latency work. What moved P95 from 45 seconds to 28, which changes cost quality and which cost money, and the three tradeoffs we chose not to take.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>engineering</category><category>latency</category><category>grounded-ai</category><category>anniversary</category></item><item><title>Section 2: the technical approach without jargon buildup</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/section-two-technical-approach/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/section-two-technical-approach/</guid><description>Why almost every technical approach section opens with the wrong sentence, what the right opening looks like, and a rewritten example from a real bid. The jargon buildup that kills evaluator attention in the first paragraph.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>craft</category><category>craft</category><category>technical-writing</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>shipley</category></item><item><title>Query understanding, a year on: where the model won</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/query-understanding-update/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/query-understanding-update/</guid><description>A year of hand-written query-rewrite rules versus LLM-based query rewriting on RFP questions. Which side won, where the hand-written rules still beat the model, and what the hybrid looks like now.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>query-rewriting</category><category>retrieval</category><category>grounded-ai</category><category>engineering</category><category>anniversary</category></item><item><title>A year in public, what we&apos;d do again</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/one-year-in-public/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/one-year-in-public/</guid><description>Three decisions that compounded over a year of building PursuitAgent in public, one we&apos;d reverse, and one we&apos;re still uncertain about. Honest operator notes on what worked and what didn&apos;t.</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>operator-notes</category><category>anniversary</category><category>founder</category><category>category</category></item><item><title>State of Proposal Tools — Wave 2 2026</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/state-of-proposal-tools-wave-2-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/state-of-proposal-tools-wave-2-2026/</guid><description>The second annual research drop. 45 vendors across four archetypes, updated capability matrices, pricing-pattern fractures, the grounded-AI taxonomy, and what changed vs. Wave 1 in August 2025.</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>research</category><category>research</category><category>category</category><category>benchmark</category><category>annual-report</category></item><item><title>The Saturday scope-creep kill list</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/saturday-scope-creep-kill-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/saturday-scope-creep-kill-list/</guid><description>A 10-minute Saturday drill. Four questions that retire a pursuit before it eats another sprint — so Monday&apos;s bid board reflects what your team can actually win.</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>bid-no-bid</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>weekend-drill</category></item><item><title>The moat question, revisited</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/the-moat-revisited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/the-moat-revisited/</guid><description>Opinion. A year in, where the durable advantage lives for a grounded-AI proposal product — and where it doesn&apos;t. Three candidate moats, two I believe in, one I don&apos;t.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>opinion</category><category>category</category><category>strategy</category><category>anniversary</category></item><item><title>Hallucination rate: a year-in measurement update</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/hallucination-rate-update/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/hallucination-rate-update/</guid><description>How we measure hallucination rate on grounded drafts, what the number looks like a year in, what moved it since the early baseline, and where the number lives in production for customers to see.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>grounded-ai</category><category>grounded-ai</category><category>hallucination</category><category>engineering</category><category>measurement</category><category>anniversary</category></item><item><title>The compliance matrix revisited, one year in</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/the-compliance-matrix-revisited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/the-compliance-matrix-revisited/</guid><description>What we wrote about compliance matrices in May 2025, what we&apos;ve learned since, and the five corrections that change the recommendation. A one-year retrospective on a foundational RFP-mechanics piece.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>compliance-matrix</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>craft</category><category>anniversary</category></item><item><title>The draft review heatmap: which sections attract edits</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/draft-review-heatmap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/draft-review-heatmap/</guid><description>A year of reviewer edit data across hundreds of drafts. Which sections attract the most edits in pink, red, and gold review — and what that pattern tells us about where craft weaknesses cluster.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>craft</category><category>craft</category><category>color-team-review</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>anniversary</category></item><item><title>Executive summaries: the shortest high-leverage document in B2B sales</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/executive-summaries-shortest-doc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/executive-summaries-shortest-doc/</guid><description>The canonical pillar on executive summaries. Why one page decides whether the proposal gets read, the five parts of a strong exec summary, two before-and-after rewrites, who signs off.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>craft</category><category>executive-summary</category><category>craft</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>shipley</category><category>apmp</category></item><item><title>State of Proposal Tools — Wave 2 preview</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/state-of-proposal-tools-wave-2-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/state-of-proposal-tools-wave-2-preview/</guid><description>A preview of the Wave 2 annual research drop. What we know now that we didn&apos;t in August, what the category looks like heading into year two, and which five shifts we&apos;re going to document in the full release next Sunday.</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>research</category><category>research</category><category>category</category><category>benchmark</category><category>annual-report</category><category>preview</category></item><item><title>Shipped: grounded-summary export with inline sources</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/shipped-grounded-summary-export/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/shipped-grounded-summary-export/</guid><description>The export path customers have asked for since month one. Executive summary exports now carry the inline citations as hyperlinks in the DOCX and PDF outputs, with an appendix that lists every evidence source in order.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>changelog</category><category>export</category><category>citations</category><category>grounded-ai</category></item><item><title>Three exec summaries I rewrote this week, part 12</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/three-exec-summaries-april-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/three-exec-summaries-april-preview/</guid><description>A short Friday field note — three exec summaries rewritten this week. A commercial SaaS bid, a federal task-order response, and a managed-services renewal. The standalone installment before Monday&apos;s long-form pillar.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>craft</category><category>craft</category><category>executive-summary</category><category>field-note</category></item><item><title>A year of ingest pipeline, condensed</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/one-year-of-ingest-pipeline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/one-year-of-ingest-pipeline/</guid><description>Forty changes to the ingest pipeline across a year of shipping. The five that actually mattered, the ones that didn&apos;t, and what the pattern says about where to spend the next year&apos;s ingest budget.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>ingest</category><category>anniversary</category><category>engineering</category><category>retrospective</category></item><item><title>Federal FY Q2 RFP surge playbook</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/federal-fy-q2-surge-playbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/federal-fy-q2-surge-playbook/</guid><description>What federal-facing proposal teams should have ready by April 1 to handle the fiscal-Q2 volume surge — pre-approved content, capture-lead calendars, bid/no-bid discipline, and what breaks under load.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>federal</category><category>playbook</category><category>seasonal</category></item><item><title>Draft attribution in exports: PDF, DOCX, HTML</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/draft-attribution-exports/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/draft-attribution-exports/</guid><description>Inline citations have to survive the export. How the rendering preserves citation anchors across the three export formats, where each format makes it hard, and the specific decisions we made to keep the attribution auditable.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>engineering</category><category>citations</category><category>export</category><category>rendering</category></item><item><title>Team rituals that stuck at one year</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/team-rituals-that-stuck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/team-rituals-that-stuck/</guid><description>The three team rituals we kept after a year, the two we killed, and the one we reintroduced after thinking we&apos;d retired it. A short field note on what a small company&apos;s process actually looks like.</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>team-workflow</category><category>team-workflow</category><category>company</category><category>rituals</category></item><item><title>Reviews watch: what G2 and Capterra said in March</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/reviews-weekly-sweep-march/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/reviews-weekly-sweep-march/</guid><description>The monthly reviews aggregation. Two incumbents took notable hits on recent feature-release quality; one sub-category showed consistent positive movement. Links, quotes where they clarify the trend, and no speculation beyond the data.</description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>research</category><category>research</category><category>reviews</category><category>category</category><category>monthly</category></item><item><title>DDQ season is now year-round</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/ddq-season-is-now-year-round/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/ddq-season-is-now-year-round/</guid><description>In 2025 the DDQ volume showed a clear seasonal peak — Q4 renewal cycles, January onboarding. A year later the seasonality has flattened. What changed and what it means for capacity planning.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>procurement</category><category>procurement</category><category>ddq</category><category>seasonality</category><category>field-note</category></item><item><title>The capture-lead role, reconsidered</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/capture-lead-role-revisited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/capture-lead-role-revisited/</guid><description>The shape of the capture-lead role we started with, the shape it became, and why the difference matters for anyone hiring into the role in 2026.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>team-workflow</category><category>team-workflow</category><category>roles</category><category>capture</category><category>field-note</category></item><item><title>New models, quarterly eval: Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.2, Gemini 3.1 Pro</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/new-models-quarterly-eval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/new-models-quarterly-eval/</guid><description>An internal eval across three current-generation models for our specific workloads — drafting, claim verification, extraction. What moved, where we switched defaults, and why one workload still sits on a year-old model.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>grounded-ai</category><category>grounded-ai</category><category>engineering</category><category>models</category><category>evaluation</category></item><item><title>SME collaboration, the six-month update</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/sme-collab-six-month-update/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/sme-collab-six-month-update/</guid><description>Revisiting the September 2025 SME-collaboration series. Which patterns persisted in real teams, which ones had to be rewritten, and the one I was wrong about.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>team-workflow</category><category>team-workflow</category><category>sme</category><category>craft</category><category>series</category></item><item><title>Compliance extraction, revisited</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/compliance-extraction-revisited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/compliance-extraction-revisited/</guid><description>The grammar we moved to for requirements extraction, why we stopped treating &apos;shall&apos; as a single class, and the evaluation showing a 38% drop in false-positive requirements.</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>engineering</category><category>compliance</category><category>extraction</category><category>rfp</category></item><item><title>The Q2 FY kickoff Monday-morning triage</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/q2-rfp-triage-monday/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/q2-rfp-triage-monday/</guid><description>Eight federal RFPs dropped into the queue over the first weekend of Q2 FY. The 25-minute drill that sorts them into respond-today, respond-this-week, and wait-for-the-amendment.</description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>federal</category><category>triage</category><category>field-note</category></item><item><title>Vendor risk management, patterns we see on the procurement side</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/vendor-risk-management-patterns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/vendor-risk-management-patterns/</guid><description>A cross-cut of roughly 200 DDQs from the last six months — the fields that repeat, the fields that vary, and what the repetition tells us about how vendor risk teams actually operate.</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>procurement</category><category>procurement</category><category>research</category><category>ddq</category><category>vendor-risk</category></item><item><title>In preview: per-answer quality score with breakdown</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/shipped-answer-quality-score/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/shipped-answer-quality-score/</guid><description>A four-dimensional quality score — clarity, grounding, compliance, brevity — is rolling out in preview on drafted answers. How the score is computed, where it lives in the UI, and what it changes about the review pass.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>engineering</category><category>changelog</category><category>quality</category><category>review</category><category>preview</category></item><item><title>Pricing at one year: what we&apos;re changing in Q2</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/pricing-one-year-view/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/pricing-one-year-view/</guid><description>The pricing experiment continues. Two new tier lines, one that&apos;s retiring, and the reasoning behind each move after a year of published pricing and real customer usage patterns.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>category</category><category>pricing</category><category>company</category></item><item><title>March reliability incidents, documented</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/reliability-incidents-march/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/reliability-incidents-march/</guid><description>Two incidents on the platform this month — one degradation, one full outage. What triggered each, how long they ran, what the user impact was, and the specific changes we made after.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>engineering</category><category>reliability</category><category>incidents</category><category>postmortem</category></item><item><title>Mapping every response paragraph to the scoring rubric</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/scoring-rubric-response-mapping/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/scoring-rubric-response-mapping/</guid><description>The discipline that turns a 60-page response into an evaluator&apos;s checklist. Why every paragraph needs a rubric citation, and how to make the mapping visible without cluttering the document.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>craft</category><category>scoring</category><category>compliance</category></item><item><title>The SLA on draft generation: 45 seconds, 95th percentile</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/sla-on-draft-generation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/sla-on-draft-generation/</guid><description>The operational target we hold draft generation to, why it&apos;s 45 seconds and not 30 or 90, and the specific things we do to hold the number under peak federal-FY-Q2 load.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>engineering</category><category>latency</category><category>sla</category><category>retrieval</category></item><item><title>Announcing versus educating, a product-comms pivot</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/announcing-vs-educating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/announcing-vs-educating/</guid><description>Why we moved from launch-day announcements to continuous smaller posts about how the product works. The shape of the shift, what we gave up, and what we gained as a team.</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>category</category><category>category</category><category>product-comms</category><category>marketing</category></item><item><title>A 2026 map of enterprise procurement platforms</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/procurement-platforms-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/procurement-platforms-2026/</guid><description>Coupa, Ariba, Workday, Ivalua, GEP, and the newer entrants. Where AI shows up in each platform&apos;s RFP workflow, what&apos;s real, what&apos;s marketing, and what it means for vendors who have to respond through these systems.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>research</category><category>research</category><category>procurement</category><category>platforms</category><category>category</category></item><item><title>The Saturday review of outgoing pursuits</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/saturday-reviews-outgoing-pursuits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/saturday-reviews-outgoing-pursuits/</guid><description>A 15-minute Saturday ritual for reviewing the week&apos;s outgoing proposal pursuits. Three questions, applied in order: what to kill, what to push, what to staff up. The cheapest pipeline discipline we run.</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>rfp-mechanics</category><category>pipeline</category><category>team-workflow</category></item><item><title>Three exec summaries I rewrote this week, part 11</title><link>https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/three-exec-summaries-march/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bidforge.com/resources/blog/three-exec-summaries-march/</guid><description>Part 11 of the monthly series. Three real executive summaries, anonymized, rewritten. What was wrong in the original, what changed in the rewrite, and what each one taught about the shape of the RFP it responded to.</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>craft</category><category>craft</category><category>executive-summary</category><category>series</category></item></channel></rss>